Real ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer are Uploaded by VCEPrep provide 2026 Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Practice Tests Dumps [Q56-Q72]

Share

Real ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer are Uploaded by VCEPrep provide 2026 Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Practice Tests Dumps.

All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps and PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam Training Courses Help candidates to study and pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam Exams hassle-free!

NEW QUESTION # 56
Why is an in-depth review crucial for organizations to evaluate their security architecture?

  • A. To conduct background checks on potential employees to ensure security compliance
  • B. To meet shareholder expectations
  • C. To assess whether security requirements based on industry best practices can be met
  • D. To determine the organization's compliance with financial regulations

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 57
Scenario 6: CB Consulting iS a reputable firm based in Dublin, Ireland. providing Strategic business Solutions to diverse clients, With a dedicated team Of professionals, CB Consulting prides itself on its commitment to excellence, integrity, and client satisfaction. CB Consulting started implementing an ISMS aligned with ISOflEC 27001 as part of its ongoing commitment to enhancing its information security practices. Throughout this process, ensuring effective communication and adherence to establi Shed security protocols is essential.
Sarah, an employee at CB has been appointed as the head Of a new project focused on managing sensitive client data, Additionally, she is responsible for Overseeing activities during the response phase of incident management, including regular reporting to the incident manager of the incident management team and keeping key stakeholders informed. Meanwhile, CB Consulting has reassigned Tom to serve as the company's legal consultant.
CB Consulting has also reassigned Clare. formerly an IT security analyst, as their information security officer to oversee the implementation Of the ISMS and ensure compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. Clare's primary responsibility iS to conduct regular risk assessments. identlfy potential vulnerabilities, and implement appropriate Security measures to mitigate risks effectively. Clare has established a procedure Stating that information security risk assessments are conducted only when significant changes occur. playing a crucial role in strengthening the companys security posture and safeguarding against potential threats.
TO ensure it has a Competent workforce to meet information security Objectives, CB Consulting has implemented a process to and verify that all employees, including Sarah, Tom, and Clare, possess the necessary competence based on their education. training, or experience. Where gaps were identified, the company has taken specific actions such as providing additional training and mentoring. Additionally, CB Consulting retains documented information as evidence of the competencies requ.red and acquired.
CB Consulting has established a robust communication strategy aligned with industry standards to ensure secure and effective information exchange. It identified the requirements for communication on relevant issues. First, the company designated specific toles. Such as a public relations officer for external communication and a Security officer for internal matters, to manage sensitive issues like data breaches. Then.
communication triggers, content. and recipients were carefully defined. with messages pre-approved by management where necessary. Lastly, dedicated channels were implemented to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of transmitted information.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.
CB Consulting prioritizes transparent and Substantive communication practices to foster trust, enhance Stakeholder engagement, and reinforce its commitment to information security excellence. Which principle of effective communication is emphasized by this approach?
Transparency
Has CB Consulting taken appropriate measures to ensure compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements regarding acquiring necessary competence? Refer to scenario 6.

  • A. No, reassigning current employees for tasks related to legal consulting is not permissible
  • B. No, reassigning current employees for tasks directly related to ISMS implementation management is not permissible
  • C. Yes. CB Consulting has taken compliant actions regarding acquiring the necessary competence

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 58
A small organization that is implementing an ISMS based on ISO/lEC 27001 has decided to outsource the internal audit function to a third party. Is this acceptable?

  • A. Yes, outsourcing the internal audit function to a third party is often a better option for small organizations to demonstrate independence and impartiality
  • B. No, the outsourcing of the internal audit function may compromise the independence and impartiality of the internal audit team
  • C. No, the organizations cannot outsource the internal audit function to a third party because during internal audit, the organization audits its own system

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, an internal audit is an audit conducted by the organization itself to evaluate the conformity and effectiveness of its information security management system (ISMS). The standard requires that the internal audit should be performed by auditors who are objective and impartial, meaning that they should not have any personal or professional interest or bias that could influence their judgment or compromise their integrity. The standard also allows the organization to outsource the internal audit function to a third party, as long as the criteria of objectivity and impartiality are met.
Outsourcing the internal audit function to a third party can be a better option for small organizations that may not have enough resources, skills, or experience to perform an internal audit by themselves. By hiring an external auditor, the organization can benefit from the following advantages:
The external auditor can provide a fresh and independent perspective on the organization's ISMS, identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that may not be apparent to the internal staff.
The external auditor can bring in specialized knowledge, expertise, and best practices from other organizations and industries, helping the organization to improve its ISMS and achieve its objectives.
The external auditor can reduce the risk of conflict of interest, bias, or influence that may arise when the internal staff audit their own work or the work of their colleagues.
The external auditor can save the organization time and money by conducting the internal audit more efficiently and effectively, avoiding duplication of work or unnecessary delays.
Therefore, outsourcing the internal audit function to a third party is acceptable and often preferable for small organizations that are implementing an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 9.2, Internal audit ISO/IEC 27007:2023, Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for information security management systems auditing PECB, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 12, Internal audit A Complete Guide to an ISO 27001 Internal Audit - Sprinto


NEW QUESTION # 59
Question:
Which statement regarding management reviews is correct?

  • A. Top management can delegate the ultimate responsibility of the management review process to individuals working for the organization
  • B. Management reviews must be carried out monthly
  • C. Management reviews are carried out at various levels in the organization

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 9.3 -Management Review:
"Top management shall review the organization's ISMS, at planned intervals, to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness." While theultimate responsibility rests with top management, reviews may be conducted atmultiple organizational levelsfor broader visibility and alignment. ISO/IEC 27004 also supports reviews at tactical and operational levels.
There isno requirementfor monthly reviews. Option C is incorrect, astop management cannot fully delegate the ultimate responsibility, only supporting roles.


NEW QUESTION # 60
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
According to scenario 7, a demilitarized zone (DMZ) is deployed within InfoSec's network. What type of control has InfoSec implemented in this case?

  • A. Preventive
  • B. Detective
  • C. Corrective

Answer: A

Explanation:
A demilitarized zone (DMZ) is a network segment that separates the internal network from the external network, such as the Internet. It is used to host public services that need to be accessible from outside the organization, such as web servers, email servers, or DNS servers. A DMZ provides a layer of protection for the internal network by limiting the exposure of the public services and preventing unauthorized access from the external network. A DMZ is an example of a preventive control, which is a type of control that aims to prevent or deter the occurrence of an information security incident. Preventive controls reduce the likelihood of a threat exploiting a vulnerability and causing harm to the organization's information assets. Other examples of preventive controls are encryption, authentication, firewalls, antivirus software, and security awareness training.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Study Guide, Section 8.2.3.2.1, page 162 ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 13 ISO/IEC 27002 : 2022, Section 13.1.3, page 66


NEW QUESTION # 61
Based on scenario 7. what else should Texas H&H Inc. do when responding to the incident?

  • A. Record and document the incident which serves as input for future corrective actions
  • B. Decide to stop using cloud services in order to eliminate the risk of similar incidents happening in the future
  • C. Communicate the updated Information security policy only to the top management of the company

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 62
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS.
However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body Based on scenario 10. NetworkFuse did not conduct a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the audit. Is this compliant to ISO/IEC 27001?

  • A. Yes, the standard does not require to conduct a self-evaluation before the audit but it is a good practice to follow
  • B. No, the auditee must review the requirements of clauses 4 to 10 before the conduct of a certification audit
  • C. Yes, the standard indicates that the auditee shall rely only on internal audit and management review reports to prepare for the certification audit

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, the organization is responsible for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving the information security management system (ISMS) in accordance with the requirements of the standard (section 4.1). The standard does not explicitly require the organization to conduct a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the certification audit, which is an external audit performed by an independent certification body to verify the conformity of the ISMS with the standard and to grant the certification (section 9.3.2). However, the standard does require the organization to conduct internal audits (section 9.2) and management reviews (section 9.3) of the ISMS at planned intervals to ensure its effectiveness, suitability and adequacy, and to identify opportunities for improvement and corrective actions.
Therefore, conducting a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the certification audit is a good practice to follow, as it can help the organization to prepare for the audit, to identify any gaps or nonconformities, and to demonstrate its commitment and readiness for the certification.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements1
* ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit
* SELF EVALUATION CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 27001:20222


NEW QUESTION # 63
Scenario 9:
OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically.
This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:
"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department." However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process.
Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Did Julia's approach to submitting action plans for addressing nonconformities align with best practices?

  • A. Yes, Julia revised the action plan to ensure alignment with best practices
  • B. Yes, as action plan submission can be flexible
  • C. No, as action plans are typically expected to meet specified deadlines

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 64
An organization has adopted a new authentication method to ensure secure access to sensitive areas and facilities of the company. It requires every employee to use a two-factor authentication (password and QR code). This control has been documented, standardized, and communicated to all employees, however its use has been "left to individual initiative, and it is likely that failures can be detected. Which level of maturity does this control refer to?

  • A. Optimized
  • B. Defined
  • C. Quantitatively managed

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer objectives and content, the maturity levels of information security controls are based on the ISO/IEC 15504 standard, which defines five levels of process capability: incomplete, performed, managed, established, and optimized1. Each level has a set of attributes that describe the characteristics of the process at that level. The level of defined corresponds to the attribute of process performance, which means that the process achieves its expected outcomes2. In this case, the control of two-factor authentication has been documented, standardized, and communicated, which implies that it has a clear purpose and expected outcomes. However, the control is not consistently implemented, monitored, or measured, which means that it does not meet the attributes of the higher levels of managed, established, or optimized. Therefore, the control is at the level of defined, which is the second level of maturity.
Reference:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Brochure, page 5
2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Presentation, slide 25


NEW QUESTION # 65
Scenario 2: Beauty is a cosmetics company that has recently switched to an e-commerce model, leaving the traditional retail. The top management has decided to build their own custom platform in-house and outsource the payment process to an external provider operating online payments systems that support online money transfers.
Due to this transformation of the business model, a number of security controls were implemented based on the identified threats and vulnerabilities associated to critical assets. To protect customers' information.
Beauty's employees had to sign a confidentiality agreement. In addition, the company reviewed all user access rights so that only authorized personnel can have access to sensitive files and drafted a new segregation of duties chart.
However, the transition was difficult for the IT team, who had to deal with a security incident not long after transitioning to the e commerce model. After investigating the incident, the team concluded that due to the out- of-date anti-malware software, an attacker gamed access to their files and exposed customers' information, including their names and home addresses.
The IT team decided to stop using the old anti-malware software and install a new one which would automatically remove malicious code in case of similar incidents. The new software was installed in every workstation within the company. After installing the new software, the team updated it with the latest malware definitions and enabled the automatic update feature to keep it up to date at all times. Additionally, they established an authentication process that requires a user identification and password when accessing sensitive information.
In addition, Beauty conducted a number of information security awareness sessions for the IT team and other employees that have access to confidential information in order to raise awareness on the importance of system and network security.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which situation described in scenario 2 Indicates service unavailability?

  • A. Lucas was asked to change his password weekly
  • B. Lucas was no! able to access the website with his credentials
  • C. Attackers still had access to the data when Solena delivered a press release

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 66
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?

  • A. The negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures
  • B. The voluminous written reports
  • C. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 9.1, an organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate its information security performance and effectiveness. This includes determining what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for doing so, when and by whom the monitoring and measurement shall be performed, when the results shall be analyzed and evaluated, and who shall be responsible for ensuring that the actions arising from the analysis and evaluation are taken 1.
SunDee failed to comply with this requirement and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS for the past two years. As a result, the company did not have any objective evidence or indicators to demonstrate the achievement of its information security objectives, the effectiveness of its controls, the satisfaction of its interested parties, or the identification and treatment of its risks. Thisalso meant that the company did not conduct regular management reviews of its ISMS, as required by clause 9.3, which would provide an opportunity for the top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to decide on any changes or improvements needed 1.
Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit, as required by clause
9.2, which is a systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled 1. However, the company did not have a well-defined audit program, scope, criteria, or methodology, and relied on the written reports of its staff for the past two years. This caused a disruption in the workforce, as most of the staff had to compile their reports for their departments, leaving the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock. Moreover, the internal audit process was very inconsistent, as the reports were written by different employees with different styles, formats, and levels of detail. The internal audit process also lacked any qualitative measures, such as performance indicators, metrics, or benchmarks, to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS.
Therefore, the cause of SunDee's workforce disruption was the negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures, which led to a lack of objective evidence, a poorly planned and executed internal audit, and a decrease in the company's productivity and stock value.
References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements


NEW QUESTION # 67
Scenario 6: Skyver offers worldwide shipping of electronic products, including gaming consoles, flat-screen TVs. computers, and printers. In order to ensure information security, the company has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001.
Colin, the company's best information security expert, decided to hold a training and awareness session for the personnel of the company regarding the information security challenges and other information security-related controls. The session included topics such as Skyver's information security approaches and techniques for mitigating phishing and malware.
One of the participants in the session is Lisa, who works in the HR Department. Although Colin explains the existing Skyver's information security policies and procedures in an honest and fair manner, she finds some of the issues being discussed too technical and does not fully understand the session. Therefore, in a lot of cases, she requests additional help from the trainer and her colleagues Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
How should Colin have handled the situation with Lisa?

  • A. Extend the duration of the training and awareness session in order to be able to achieve better results
  • B. Deliver training and awareness sessions for employees with the same level of competence needs based on the activities they perform within the company
  • C. Promise Lisa that future training and awareness sessions will be easily understandable

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, the organization should determine the necessary competence of persons doing work under its control that affects the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS. The organization should also ensure that these persons are aware of the information security policy, their contribution to the effectiveness of the ISMS, the implications of not conforming with the ISMS requirements, and the benefits of improved information security performance. The organization should also provide information security awareness, education, and training to all employees and, where relevant, contractors and third-party users, as relevant for their job function. The awareness, education, and training programs should be planned, implemented, and maintained according to the needs of the organization and the results of the risk assessment and risk treatment.
Therefore, Colin should have handled the situation with Lisa by delivering training and awareness sessions for employees with the same level of competence needs based on the activities they perform within the company.
This would ensure that the content and the language of the sessions are appropriate and understandable for the target audience, and that the sessions are effective and efficient in achieving the desired learning outcomes. By doing so, Colin would also avoid wasting time and resources on delivering sessions that are too technical or too basic for some employees, and that do not address their specific information security challenges and responsibilities.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Clause 7.2 Competence and Clause 7.3 Awareness
* ISO/IEC 27002:2022, Clause 7.2.2 Information security awareness, education and training
* PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4: Leadership, Commitment, and Support of Top Management.


NEW QUESTION # 68
Which of the situations below can negatively affect the internal audit process?

  • A. Reporting the internal audit results to the top management
  • B. Conducting internal audit interviews with all employees of the organization
  • C. Restricting the internal auditor's access to offices and documentation

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer course, one of the factors that can negatively affect the internal audit process is the lack of cooperation from the auditees, which can manifest as restricting the internal auditor's access to offices and documentation1. This can hinder the auditor's ability to collect sufficient and appropriate audit evidence, verify the conformity of the information security management system (ISMS) with the audit criteria, and identify any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the auditees should be informed of the audit objectives,scope, criteria, and schedule in advance, and should provide the auditor with all the necessary information and resources to conduct the audit effectively3.
References: 1: PECB, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Internal Audit, slide 22 2: PECB, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Internal Audit, slide 23 3: PECB, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Internal Audit, slide 24


NEW QUESTION # 69
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on scenario 7. InfoSec contracted Anna as an external consultant. Based on her tasks, is this action compliant with ISO/IEC 27001°

  • A. No, the skills of incident response or forensic analysis shall be developed internally
  • B. Yes, forensic investigation may be conducted internally or by using external consultants
  • C. Yes, organizations must use external consultants for forensic investigation, as required by the standard

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 8.2.3, the organization shall establish and maintain an incident response process that includes the following activities:
* a) planning and preparing for incident response, including defining roles and responsibilities, establishing communication channels, and providing training and awareness;
* b) detecting and reporting information security events and weaknesses;
* c) assessing and deciding on information security incidents;
* d) responding to information security incidents according to predefined procedures;
* e) learning from information security incidents, including identifying root causes, taking corrective actions, and improving the incident response process;
* f) collecting evidence, where applicable.
The standard does not specify whether the incident response process should be performed internally or externally, as long as the organization ensures that the process is effective and meets the information security objectives. Therefore, the organization may decide to use external consultants for forensic investigation, as long as they comply withthe organization's policies and procedures, and protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information involved.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 8.2.3; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Study Guide, section 8.2.3.


NEW QUESTION # 70
Based on ISO/IEC 27001, what areas within the organization require establishing rules, procedures, and agreements for information transfer?

  • A. Public and private cloud services and partner collaboration platforms
  • B. Internal file-sharing platforms and shared drives
  • C. All transfer facilities within the organization

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 71
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on scenario 7, what should Anna be aware of when gathering data?

  • A. The collection and preservation of records
  • B. The use of the buffer zone that blocks potential attacks coming from malicious websites where data can be collected
  • C. The type of data that helps prevent future occurrences of information security incidents

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 standard, information security incident management is the process of ensuring a consistent and effective approach to the managementof information security incidents, events and weaknesses. One of the objectives of this process is to collect and preserve evidence that can be used for disciplinary and legal action, as well as for learning and improvement. Therefore, Anna should be aware of the collection and preservation of records when gathering data for the forensics team. She should follow the information security incident management policy of InfoSec, which specifies the type, format, content and location of the records to be created and maintained. She should also ensure that the records are protected from unauthorized access, modification, deletion or disclosure, and that they are retained for an appropriate period of time.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 16.1.7, Collection of evidence
* ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A.16.1.7, Collection of evidence
* ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Study Guide, Chapter 9, Information security incident management


NEW QUESTION # 72
......

Valid Way To Pass PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam with : https://www.vceprep.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer-latest-vce-prep.html

Free Test Engine For PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam Certification Exams: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ar-4ssFaANjDG6RfOKt_h32kCsvIBVdE